Just read the couple of articles written by Paul Graham : Y Combinator (answers what exactly does YC do?  or  Seedcamp, Techstars, MVP etc ) and Equity (explains why should you give 5-6% equity to a program like YC)

The thoughts expressed got me thinking about how should First Time Entrepreneurs (FTEs) go about building businesses in India. While a lot is in common between the approaches of YC, SC and MVP there are a bunch of things unique to the Indian Ecosystem which FTEs should consider.

Uniqueness of India

First things first, only during the last 10 years India has started seeing bootstrapped or garage startups by talented, educated, experienced and passionate folks who dont have access to a lot of capital but have the skills, will to solve problems and the staying power. The number of successes out of these have been limited and have not been really publicized for folks to get inspired by or learn from.

The VC industry is just about 8-10 years old in India as compared to 50-60 years in US and Europe; among them majority of the funds in India are under 5 years old. VC being a long gestation industry we are a good 5-10 years away from seeing major VC success in India. Most of the firms are focusing on the existing pipeline deals in the market and there are quite of few of these available – companies by serial entrepreneurs, companies started by Executives (CXO, VPs) from large companies, some of FTE companies where the traction is fairly significant, also since PE sector has performed very well and the bigger funds are shifting time and money to PE  deals. Clearly all of the above are the right things to do for the Indian VC firms, since the firms need to perform for their investors. None of this directly supports the FTEs, which is where the gap that needs to be filled in.  We need to create new pipeline of deals that will become successful startups and will feed into the VC pipeline 1-2 years later. That’s the role folks like MVP, iAccelerator, Upstart.in and others are attempting to play.

Another dimension of difference is IT / internet. The penetration of Internet and PCs in India is quite limited (9 computer for every 1000 people, as compared to 700 for every 1000 in USA). On the other hand the awareness and usage of IT in companies, specially SMEs is limited as well. There are a lot of other fundamental needs to be fulfilled in India (remember we are a developing country).

FTEs in India: What to focus on ?

First thing to ensure is to build a cash flow positive business within the initial capital that you have managed to raise (self, friends, family, fools). Keep lowest possible costs and create early revenues. Expenses should ideally be below 50,000 INR and in no circumstances higher than 1,00,000 INR a month.

Dont think of funding as a validation for your venture. Be prepared to wait longer, to build your business to the 50-100 crore revenues in 7-10 years, with VC funding coming after 2-3 years of being in business or no VC funding at all. If this does not appeal – don’t do a startup.

Internet only business models targetting indian market are not going to viable for atleast 2 years ( or more). View internet as a cheap way to build products and get the initial users with zero marketing budgets. From day one build alternate channels : mobile, call center, SMS, kiosks , shops , sales team into your model. Use technology as a enabler to drive costs down and to drive quaity upwards, but do not depend on customers using it directly via internet.

If your idea only lends itself to internet, think about doing it for developed markets like US and Europe.  India still has lower costs and we are very bullish on build here – sell to the developed world model.

So while you take into consideration the universal wisdom of building businesses, paying attention to the uniqueness of India can make an big impact on the outcome of your venture.

Tags: , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 at 2:04 pm and is filed under MVP, entrepreneurship, startup, startup essentials. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 comments so far

 1 

Well said. Besides “cash flow positive” and “low cost” I would also add “scalability”. I know quite a few people who started business that sounded exciting and ‘cutting edge’ but failed to execute after a year as the model was not scalable.

March 3rd, 2009 at 2:29 pm
Rohit Gupta
 2 

I strongly believe that first time entrepreneurs shouldn’t raise any capital. Raising capital (read investors) brings its own set of problems – managing board, control, dilution, etc and must be avoided at any cost.

FTEs should aim small – try to build a $2mn company with 50% success rate instead of building a $10mn business with 10% success rate or $100mn business with 1% success rate.

These days its not very difficult to build a web based business on zero cost structures – use open source, zero marketing and distribution costs. The only thing you have to pay for is hosting, which is cheap anyways.

If cost structures are zero, you’ll be profitable pretty quick and it’ll be impossible to kill you.

March 3rd, 2009 at 3:51 pm
 3 

heyy…thts a good one…

March 4th, 2009 at 12:54 am
satya vyas
 4 

Nice one Sameer..had problems raising funding myself..
http://www.satyavyas.wordpress.com

March 4th, 2009 at 10:19 am
 5 

Focus should always be to build a sustainable business and definitely not raising money. If (and only if) former happens, later follows. Nice article Sameer….

March 4th, 2009 at 10:56 am
sameer
 6 

@ sahil: agree with your point. One has to keep an eye on the scalability aspect.

@ rohit: well said. Most of the successful Indian entrepreneurs have followed the path of building stuff in their own capital reaching profitability and building it further. Examples: Dhirubhai, subhash chandra, mittals, narayan murthy, sanjiv bhikchandani etc.

@ sumit: You have hit the nail on the head. Just because a team raises money it does not guarantee that they will build a strong business. But a strong business can 100% get funded. Most of the folks get the order wrong.

March 4th, 2009 at 11:28 am
 7 

With specific context to the IT industry, I would agree that there is potential to build a scalable business model without incurring too much costs

That said, I would like to quote some perspectives provided by Sramana Mitra (Forbes.com) ” I see it as a two-pronged problem: Indian entrepreneurs do not have the experience of bringing products to market, and Indian angel investors do not have a visceral understanding of how products are built or marketed. Hence, on both sides of the negotiation table, we have inexperienced people. Thus, we have a blind leading the blind situation and, predictably, deals don’t happen. Angels don’t trade. Unless angel investors who do have the experience start playing in India, the vitally important “mentor capital” component will continue to be absent. And without that mentorship, the entrepreneurs will not be successful in bringing product or innovation to market.”

I personally feel there is a huge need for a public innovation and entrepreneurship platform that will help teaming amongst Idea stage Entrepreneurs with Contributors and create huge visibility of Ideas and Entrepreneurs. It is time we grew this community and Slumdogged it!

March 4th, 2009 at 1:51 pm
sameer
 8 

@ RR. You make an interesting point about blind leading blind, folks who have not built businesses in past but are funding and advising now. Many entrepreneurs consider money as 100X more important than any other factor and hence continue to fall head over heels to impress these folks. This could be fairly disastrous for the life of the venture.

March 5th, 2009 at 11:25 am
 9 

And you are on the right spot Sameer – If I were to choose between the 2 Ms – MONEY or MENTOR, I’d dare to err towards the latter. Keep up the good work you doing Champ, or shall I say Jai Ho!

March 5th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
 10 

My 2 cents, as a first generation entrepreneur.

Startups, especially early stage and first time entrepreneurs need a lot of good mentoring than huge investment. Money at a very early stage (pre-revenue, pre-product, pre-customer) can bring a lot of obstacles as well.

1. First and the biggest obstacle. You need lot of energy and time to raise funds. Indian VCs have a tendency to take a lot of time in evaluating a company before funding them. This could lead to you losing a lot of crucial time at an early stage of your startup. The time when you should be searching for new customers, features, and PR instead of working on your Business Plan PPT, financial models, exit strategy. Yes you heard it right, exit strategy. Few VCs will ask them.Distractions are your worst enemy, and going after VCs at an early stage can be a big distraction.

2. Try to ensure that you require money to grow, not to survive. Your venture should be making enough money to at least fund your current operations. And trust me on this; going after customers is much easier than going after VCs.

3. Work on a milestone not on a date when you should start looking for funds. The milestone could be anything, 10,000th registered member, 100th paying client, revenue of $200K per annum, 1 million pageviews etc. But get that milestone first, before even working on your business plan PPT. This will help you focus all your energy on your venture.

4. Look for mentors, advisers and friends rather than investors.

5. Keep your costs as low as you can, you don’t need rackspace servers to start with. Even Dreamhost account, or Godaddy servers can do the job for few months. 15’’ CRTs and Linux running on celeron machines are good, if you are going to spend most of the time in programming.

April 10th, 2009 at 1:45 pm
 11 

agree..you should not look for VC funding at initial stage of startup. they make things complicated and you have to work acc to them and ultimately funding is also a kind of debt..the later you raise funding the less share you need to give them..:)

February 12th, 2010 at 11:06 pm
gaurav
 12 

valuable thoughts u guys has shared…

February 20th, 2010 at 2:52 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment